Tag: podcasts

Podcast Episode: Living by God’s Instructions: A Faith Journey

Podcast Episode: Living by God’s Instructions: A Faith Journey

Pip: There is a particular kind of morning ritual that starts with Scripture and ends with a question you cannot easily shake — and cj has been living inside one of those.

Mara: This episode follows a single extended meditation on what it actually means to live by God’s instructions — the tension between hearing and doing, between belief and action, and what Ezekiel and James have to say about where loyalty really lies.

Pip: Let’s get into the faith journey itself.

Living by God’s Instructions: A Faith Journey

Mara: The question at the center of this post is whether faith is something you hold or something you do — and whether the two can come apart without consequence.

Pip: The post opens with a daily recitation cj has built into morning Scripture reading, and the passage from Ezekiel 33 that it unlocked: “Turn! Turn from your evil ways! For why should you die, O house of Israel?”

Mara: That imperative is the hinge. Ezekiel’s point, and the post’s point, is that past righteousness does not bank credit against future sin — and past wickedness does not foreclose future restoration. The ledger resets on the direction you are currently moving.

Pip: Which is either deeply liberating or deeply unsettling, depending on which direction you thought you had locked in.

Mara: The post is careful to distinguish obedience from performance. The framing is direct: “Obedience isn’t works, it’s covenant.” Forgiveness is a promise, but it is tied to the orientation of the heart, not the accumulation of good deeds done while continuing to do as you please.

Mara: James gets quoted at length on exactly this point — the mirror illustration, where a hearer of the word walks away and forgets his own face. The post identifies the “perfect law of liberty” James names as Torah, God’s instruction in righteousness, and cites Strong’s definition of liberty as freedom from corrupt desires so that the soul acts freely in alignment with God’s will.

Pip: So liberty, in this reading, is not freedom from the law — it is freedom through it.

Mara: The post also draws on Acts 15, where the Jerusalem council’s guidance to gentile believers is framed as a beginning, not a ceiling — a first set of steps into a process of ongoing instruction read every Sabbath. Faith here is explicitly described as progressive, growing, active.

Pip: The closing question lands without softening: how are you seeking, how are you growing — because faith, the post says, is not stagnant, not passive, and not finished.

Mara: The through-line is that hearing and doing are not the same thing, and the gap between them is where the real work of faith lives.

Pip: The kind of work that apparently starts before breakfast, with a statement that challenges you before the day has a chance to.

Mara: Read the post in its entirety: Living by God’s Instructions: A Faith Journey at thewayoftherabbi.com

Podcast Episode: Light vs Darkness: The True Meaning of God’s Instruction

Podcast Episode: Light vs Darkness: The True Meaning of God’s Instruction

Pip: If you’ve ever wondered whether “let your light shine” was secretly a Torah study prompt, cj at The Way of the Rabbi has thoughts — and citations.

Mara: This episode works through one sustained argument: that light and darkness in Scripture are symbolic language for Torah and the absence of it, and that the stakes of misreading that language are higher than most churches acknowledge.

Pip: Let’s get into what Isaiah 5:20 is actually saying — and who it might be aimed at.

—

Light vs Darkness: Torah as the True Instruction

Mara: The post opens with a familiar cultural reference — Isaiah 5:20 and the idea that good is called evil and evil good — then immediately pivots: the argument is that the church has been reading this verse too narrowly, missing that it describes the rejection of Torah itself.

Pip: And the verse lands hard in context. The setup is “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil,” and the post defines evil through 1 John 3:4: “Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness” — where lawlessness means outside the Torah.

Mara: That definition does real work here. If sin is lawlessness and lawlessness means outside God’s instruction, then calling Torah obsolete isn’t a minor theological quibble — it’s the very inversion Isaiah is warning against.

Pip: The post goes further and names the problem directly inside the church. It argues that mainstream Christianity rejects Torah while claiming Paul as the authority for doing so — and then quotes Peter pushing back on exactly that reading.

Mara: The quote is pointed: “the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction.” That’s 2 Peter 3:16, and the post uses it to argue that Paul has been systematically misread, that he upheld Torah, taught it, and instructed Timothy to hold fast to it.

Pip: So the light-darkness imagery isn’t decoration — it’s load-bearing. The post walks through passages from John, Ephesians, and 1 Peter and asks the reader to substitute “Torah” for “light” in each one.

Mara: The substitution exercise is the heart of the argument. “He that follows me shall not walk in darkness” becomes “he that follows me shall not walk outside of instruction.” The post’s claim is that Yahoshua as the Word made flesh makes this reading not just poetic but literal.

Pip: And the bitter-to-sweet axis from Isaiah 5:20 gets the same treatment — Psalm 119:103, Hebrews 6:5, the honey imagery — all pointing to Torah as something to be tasted, not discarded.

Mara: The post closes with a direct challenge: “Did God change so we wouldn’t have to?” It cites Isaiah 29:13 and Matthew 15:7-9 on lips-versus-heart worship, and ends with a single question — are you following the instruction of the Father, or the commandments of men?

Pip: That question doesn’t resolve neatly, which is probably the point.

—

Mara: The through-line here is that language carries theology — and that reading light as instruction rather than sentiment changes what obedience actually looks like.

Pip: Next time, we’ll see what else that thread pulls on.

Read the Post: Light vs Darkness, here.