Podcast Episode: The Remnant, the Narrow Way, and the New Covenant in Messiah

Podcast Episode: The Remnant, the Narrow Way, and the New Covenant in Messiah

Pip: There is a road, apparently, and it is narrow — and according to cj’s recent writing at The Way of the Rabbi, most of us are on the other one.

Mara: The posts this episode cover a lot of ground: what a remnant actually is, what the New Covenant asks of the people in it, and what faithful obedience looks like across both Testaments. Let’s start with the remnant itself, and what it costs to be counted in it.

The Remnant, the Narrow Way, and the New Covenant

Pip: The post opens with a deceptively simple question: what does a remnant look like? And the answer the text gives is uncomfortable — eight people. Out of the whole of humanity, eight. That is the frame the rest of the argument builds on.

Mara: The post draws the line between Noah’s favor and his family’s salvation directly. Setting up the theological stakes, it quotes Paul’s letter to the Romans: “So too at the present time there is a remnant, chosen by grace. But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace.”

Pip: So grace is doing the choosing — but the post is quick to say that does not let us off the hook. Yahweh says “I have kept for Myself,” but the post insists our decisions are still in the equation. The remnant is small because obedience is chosen, not automatic.

Mara: And the post works through what disobedience costs, concretely. Lot’s wife was told to flee and turned back. Ham made it onto the ark and was later cursed. The post reads those as object lessons — surviving the judgment does not guarantee faithfulness inside it.

Pip: The wide road is well-traveled for a reason. It requires nothing.

Mara: The post then turns to Romans 11 on the olive tree — the broken branches and the grafted-in wild shoots — and quotes it at length. “Do not become proud, but fear. For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will He spare you.” The kindness of God, the post argues, is covenantal. You continue in it, or you are cut off.

Mara: What that means practically is that the New Covenant is not new in content — it is the same covenant, now written on hearts, with the Holy Spirit as the guide on the narrow road. Gentile believers are not joining a new thing; they are being grafted into Israel.

Pip: The post closes by pointing to a companion piece on faith — Understanding Faith: Beyond Belief and Action — for readers who want to follow the thread on what active faith actually looks like. The invitation at the end is direct: choose the remnant, choose the narrow way, choose the covenant.

Mara: And the weight of that choice, the post says, extends beyond the individual — “perhaps by implication, the eternity of your family depends on it.”

Pip: Which brings us back to Noah, and why the post opened there at all.


Pip: Eight people. One ark. The math of a remnant has never been comfortable reading.

Mara: But the post is less interested in the numbers than in the question underneath them — what does it mean to walk in the kindness of God, and to keep walking? That question does not close here.

Read the post in its entirety here: The Remnant, the Narrow Way, and the New Covenant in Messiah

Podcast Episode: He Will Never Fail You: Trust, Obedience, and Psalm 118 Hope

Podcast Episode: He Will Never Fail You: Trust, Obedience, and Psalm 118 Hope

Pip: There is a genre of writing that takes an ancient promise, traces it through three thousand years of Scripture, and lands it in your inbox on a Tuesday. cj writes that genre, and writes it well.

Mara: This episode follows one sustained meditation — on trust, obedience, and what Psalm 118 actually asks of the people who lean on it. Let’s start with that promise and what comes attached to it.

He Will Never Fail You: Trust, Obedience, and Psalm 118

Pip: The phrase “He will never fail you or abandon you” gets repeated in Christian circles often enough to lose its edges. This post is interested in restoring those edges — asking what the promise actually includes, and what it assumes about the one receiving it.

Mara: Psalm 118 opens the argument, and the post quotes it at length. Here is the spine of it: “From my being hemmed in I called on Yah; He answered and gave me more room. With Adonai on my side, I fear nothing — what can human beings do to me?”

Pip: That image of being hemmed in and then given room is doing real work. It is not a promise that the pressure disappears — it is a promise that the space expands. The stakes are different from what the comfort-poster version implies.

Mara: The post traces that promise backward through Deuteronomy, where Moses charges Joshua before the crossing: “Adonai — it is He who will go ahead of you. He will be with you. He will neither fail you nor abandon you, so don’t be afraid or downhearted.” But the post is careful to note what immediately follows in Joshua’s own commissioning.

Pip: Right — and here is where the post sharpens. The promise in Joshua comes bundled with an instruction: follow the Torah, do not turn from it left or right, keep it on your lips and meditate on it day and night. The assurance and the obedience are not separable.

Mara: That is the post’s central move. It defines righteousness directly from Scripture as obedience to the instruction of Elohim, and argues that the new covenant does not dissolve that obligation — it internalizes it. Matthew 5 is quoted: “Don’t think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to bring to fullness.”

Pip: The name change from Hoshea to Yahoshua — Salvation to Yah is Salvation — gets its own moment here, and it earns it. The argument is that redemption is encoded in the name before the story is told.

Mara: The post closes with Hebrews 13, which loops the Psalm back to the present: “God Himself has said, ‘I will never fail you or abandon you.’ Therefore, we say with confidence, ‘Adonai is my helper; I will not be afraid.'” The promise is ancient, the application is immediate, and the obedience is the condition that holds it together.

Pip: Trust and obey — the post ends with exactly those words. Not as a cliché, but as a conclusion the whole reading earns.


Mara: What stays with me is that the promise and the instruction travel together — you cannot lift one out without the other flattening.

Pip: Ancient text, Tuesday morning, same hemmed-in feeling, same offered room. More of that next time.

Read the whole post here: He Will Never Fail You: Trust, Obedience, and Psalm 118 Hope