An on going email conversation with two Mormon Missionaries. Part 5. i encourage you to go back and read parts one, two, three, and four. Although, it isn’t absolutely necessary it would be beneficial.

my friends,

Let me begin by saying there is no need to apologize or explain any delay. This is the joy of email. We get to take our time. Allow life to happen around us while at the same time continue in dialogue.

Have you ever used the word love to express a feeling? For example, one might say, “I love taco’s.” Or “I love my wife.” Or “I love my kids.” Or “I love God.” A couple of points we would agree, all of these things are awesome. In English, we understand that in each instance what we mean by love is different in each of these circumstances. It is true that i love taco’s and i love my kids. However, i do not love them in the same way obviously. Of course my love for Elohim is beyond the limits of our English definition of love. English is a terrible language, it is full of inconsistencies. Partly because over time meanings have changed but also the English language is lacking in depth. 

For a time i taught 6th grade. During class one day we were having a discussion on classic works. We were reading as a class “A Christmas Carol,” by Charles Dickens. As well discussing classic Christmas songs. For the sixth grade mind this wasn’t too far a leap. In the discussion one of the kids genuinely asked, “Why are they putting on gay clothes?” There is a classic Christmas Carol wherein there is a line, “Now we dawn our gay apparel.” Thinking they were putting on flamboyant gay-pride sort of clothing. This allowed for the conversation on language evolution. Gay once meant happy, to be gay didn’t mean to be homosexual, but to be joyful. So context, culture, language, audience, these things matter.

More deeply let us consider the letter ‘J’. When originally introduced had a soft ‘Y’ sound like the Latin ‘J’ still has to this day. For example the name Juan still carries the soft ‘Y’ in its pronunciation. However, even here there has been an evolution of the ‘J’ from that found in ‘Wahn’ to ‘Hey’. It is why the Hispanic cultures pronounce Jesus, Hey-Soos. It is the evolution of language and it can be found in every tongue. Therefore, we must be careful when interpreting things to always go back to as close to the original as possible. Who was the intended target? What was the overarching context? What other words are used that may alter the meanings? How would the original hearers have received the information. Perhaps most importantly from Whom is the origin and what have we been told about Him?

For instance, in Hosea, a book of redemption. A call to repentance, to turn from doing your own way to following the Way of Adonai. We read, “Whoever is wise, let him understand these things; whoever is discerning, let him know them. For the ways of Adonai are right, and the righteous walk in them but the rebellious stumble in them.” Hosea 14:9

Without these steps we are guessing at meanings, applying modern understandings. Over simplifying or over complicating words and meanings. We must be intellectually honest with the text in order to truly understand its meaning. As you state, “So what matters is whether the man who translated it had authority from God to do so.” i would assert that the same intended original meaning, is the same intended meaning for today. For Elohim is the same, yesterday, today and forever. This is His nature, this is what He says of Himself. The origin of the written Word is the Word Himself.  

When talking about authority we must take into account all of this, culture, context, language etc. Who is authorized to speak on behalf of Elohim? Is precisely the point i am trying to make. “But even if we — or, for that matter, an angel from heaven! — were to announce to you some so-called “Good News” contrary to the Good News we did announce to you, let him be under a curse forever!” Galatians 1:8

In all of this what is the test? i would agree it is the Holy Spirits work within the believer to teach and lead in all righteousness. Yet still how do we test the Spirit as we are called to do? We test the Spirit by the Word. Did you know that within the pages of the Quran the reader is instructed to pray for wisdom? 

“My Lord, increase me in knowledge.” Surah Taha 20:114
“O believers! Seek comfort in patience and prayer. Allah is truly with those who are patient” Surah Al-Baqarah 2:153                                        
“Successful indeed are the believers: those who humble themselves in prayer” Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:1-2

We must be careful when instructing others to pray over material, books, writings, notes, even situations. “Stay sober, stay alert! Your enemy, the Adversary, stalks about like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour.” 1 Peter 5:8

“You believe that “God is one”? Good for you! The demons believe it too — the thought makes them shudder with fear!” James 2:19

“The fact is that such men are pseudo-emissaries: they tell lies about their work and masquerade as emissaries of the Messiah. There is nothing surprising in that, for the Adversary himself masquerades as an angel of light; so it’s no great thing if his workers masquerade as servants of righteousness. They will meet the end their deeds deserve.” 2 Corinthians 11:13-15

“Now the Bereans here were of nobler character than the ones in Thessalonica; they eagerly welcomed the message, checking the Tanakh every day to see if the things Paul was saying were true.” Acts 17:11

This brings me to your point of the Canon of Scripture. The council of Nicea was an abomination. They lacked authority and were lead by pagan “converts” lacking wisdom, knowledge, and integrity. i am sorry you miss understood my point about John and Revelation. Here i was simply trying to state that of all the writers of what we call the New Testament. Only John makes a reference to His letter being for all ages to the end. Not in so many words but the emphasis is there. My point, simply, that Matthew, Mark, Luke, Peter, James, Jude, even Paul himself didn’t write with the intention of Moses. In that what they were saying, wasn’t going to supersede the Torah or the Tanakh. They quoted from the Tanakh. In Acts we read, “On hearing it, they praised Elohim; but they also said to him, ‘You see, brother, how many tens of thousands of believers there are, and they are all zealots for the Torah.’” Acts 21:20

Peter actually speaks directly against the idea that Paul was somehow preaching against the Torah. He writes, “Indeed, he speaks about these things in all his letters. They contain some things that are hard to understand, things which the uninstructed and unstable distort, to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures.” 2 Peter 3:16

From this, how do we know one is truly walking in the Word? Anointed and worthy of listening? What are the fruits we are to look for? Yes, we can certainly see from ones life, are they a good person. But there are a lot of “good people,” doing a lot of good things, but they deny the Savior Yahoshua. Are these fruits still good to consume, when it comes to how to walk out a life of Faith in Messiah? No, even if we can learn from them on how to care for those around us. We aren’t to listen to them in matters of the Spirit and of Faith.

How do we know someone is walking with Elohim in order to avoid, confusion, contentions, and contradictions? Do they honor the Sabbath? In the book of Acts there are 85 references to the early believers observing the Sabbath Day. Do they honor the Feast Days? Paul in more than one letter talked about His desire to get back to Jerusalem to honor the Feasts. These are the marks of the followers of Elohim. To make this point further let me ask a question, what is sin? Based on the definition of sin, then what is repentance? What did Yahoshua mean when He said, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life, no one comes to the Father except through Me.”?

First, what is sin? For the simplest most straightforward answer we can look to John. John writes, “Everyone who keeps sinning is violating Torah — indeed, sin is violation of Torah.” 1 John 3:4 – Of course as i have stated in previous emails the word Torah is translated law. Most Bibles, of course, read “sin is lawlessness.” Truer yet, sin is Torahlessness. 

There are several references to the lawless one. Also known as the Anti-Christ. Anti or opposition/opposing. What law is he without? What law does he oppose? It isn’t the law of the land, it is indeed the Torah. He opposes Elohim and His Word, therefore he is referred to as Torahless or lawless. 

If we are to repent when we come into relationship with Yahoshua, what is it that we are repenting of? Sin? Which is? It is of course what John sights, “Sin is violation of Torah.” Yahoshua is said to be the Word made flesh. Another quote from John. He said, that He only speaks what the Father speaks and does what the Father does. John 5:19.

To close this point for now let me finish my thought with this quote of Yahoshua. “For if you believed Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote of me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?” John 5:46-47. This is the point. We only know sin by the Torah. We only know repentance, through Torah. You only truly understand Yahoshua through Torah.

When Yahoshua, made the statement that He was the Way, the Truth, and the Life. The hearers would have recognized the saying. For you see, the Torah was known as, The Way, Path, and Instruction. It was known as the Truth, “Your Word is Truth.” It was known as the Life, “Man shall not live by bread alone but by every Word of Elohim.” 

There is much more that can be said on this subject. However, this is also a good stopping point. 

If you are just joining the conversation, please go back and read parts one, two, three, and four. (links above in the introduction)

You are loved,
cj